Saturday, April 02, 2005

Long Distance by Bill McKibben

Glory of all sorts wears off quickly – by afternoon the morning’s fine book review has receded toward the back of your mind. So you’ve either got to arrange for regular triumphs or learn to enjoy instead the long slog that keeps you in the game.

Other things wear off as well. At the moment my father died, it seemed impossible that the emotional power of that moment, the overwhelming sense of life’s fragility and urgency and beauty, would simply erode. But of course it did – that’s how we’re built. I missed him, sometimes acutely, but he was vanishing into that hazy, slightly idealized world where people go when they die. I didn’t want the lessons he’d taught me to go with him.

Most of long chain gurus, cranks and messiahs that have illumined human civilization have agreed on one point: that it’s what you do every day, day in day out, that forms who you are. Not what you do on special occasions. Clearly this was true of one’s physical life: You could go out tomorrow and force yourself to run ten miles, and if it was the only run you did all month, your body would not change at all (except that it would be very stiff and sore for a few days). It’s the long accretion of elevated heartbeats, of muscle-fiber twitches, of deep breaths that over time remake your plumbing, resize your lungs. And I knew from even longer experience that the same held true for intellectual life. Sudden flashes of insight might propel you forward, but hose sudden flashes only came to people who worked with consistent dedication to learn the new, to master the old.

What Dad’s death taught me, I think, was that the same holds true for the spiritual life, to use a grander term than he would have ever employed. People’s deaths often really do magnify who they are, intensify their essence instead of disguising it. His serenity and grace and egolessness were not sudden saintly touches applied with the strenuous effort at the very end; they were grooves into which his life had fallen by long practice of kindness and selflessness. Not in any dramatic way (or in his case perhaps any conscious), but instead in the simple daily encounter with those around him. That patient, unflashy drip drip drip of love changed him as fundamentally as (more fundamentally than) my patient daily drip of long slow runs. Occasionally real tests arise, times when you need to consciously and maybe painfully lay aside something you want to do in order for your spouse or your child to find their fulfillment – call those uphill intervals, wind sprints. You don’t want to do them, but you’re stronger because of them. And then there are the longer tests, more like marathons: sickness, depression, all the flavors of angst and ennui, all the sad temptations of hypermaterialsim and hyperindividulism. They are like the races, I suppose, calling for all the strength that daily habit has engraved in your heart. The most profound test, of course, is the last one, dealing with your death. But if you’ve done the training, the race will take care of itself – or so it seemed, watching Dad.

This metaphor is too grand, doubtless. Life as an endurance race. But what made this project so sweet for me was the dawning understanding that an endurance race, though tough, was also enormous fun. Even though it didn’t supply any of the things – comfort, convenience security – that our society trains us to want, it provided a much deeper joy. As does, I suspect , a committed life of the mind or of the heart. At any rate, I’d like to find out. Right now, though it’s time for my run.
~pg. 191-192

Thursday, May 13, 2004

Only Forward by Michael Marshall Smith

How many times have you tried to talk to someone about something that matters to you, tried to get them to see it the way you do? And how many of those times have ended in you feeling bitter, resenting them for making you feel like your pain doesn’t have any substance after all?

Like when you’ve split up with someone, and you try to communicate the way you feel, because you need to say the words, need to feel that somebody understands just how pissed off and frightened you feel. The problem is, they never do. ‘Plenty more fish in the sea,’ they’ll say, or ‘You’re better off without them,’ or ‘Do you want some of these potato chips?’ They never really understand, because they haven’t been there, every day, every hour. They don’t know the way things have been, the way it’s made you, the way it has structured your world. They’ll never realize that someone who makes you feel bad may be the person you need most in the world. They don’t understand the history, the background, don’t know the pillars of memory that hold you up. Ultimately, they don’t know you well enough, and they never can. Everyone’s alone in their world, because everybody’s life is different. You can send people letters, and show them photos, but they can never come to visit where you live.

Unless you love them. And then they can burn it down.
~ pg 258-259

Friday, September 12, 2003

The Sparrow by Mary Doria Russell

Returned to the library prematurely.

Monday, March 18, 2002

The Cassini Division by Ken MacLeod

Life is a process of breaking down and using other matter, and if need be, other life. Therefore , life is aggression , and successful life is successful aggression. Life is the scum of matter, and people are the scum of life. There is nothing but matter, forces, space and time, which together make power. Nothing matters, except what matters to you. Might makes right, and power makes freedom. You are free to do whatever is in your power, and if you want to survive and thrive you had better do whatever is in your interests. If you interests conflict with those of others, let the others pit their power against yours, everyone for theirselves. if you interests coincide with those of others, let them work together with you, and against the rest.We are what we eat, and we eat everything.

All that you really value, and the goodness and truth and beauty of life, have their roots in this apparently barren soil.
This is the true knowledge

On this rock we had build our church. We had founded our idealism on the most nihilistic implications of science, our socialism on crass self-interest, our peace on our capacity for mutual destruction, and our liberty on determinism. We had replaced morality with convention, bravery with safety, frugality with plenty, philosophy with science, stoicism with anesthetics and piety with immortality. The universal acid of the true knowledge had burned away a world of words, and exposed a universe of things.
Things we could use.

- Page 114

But you should know something about us, about me. I don't seek justice. We don't believe in justice. We have true knowledge.There is no justice. But there is defense, and deterrence and revenge. That's what I want. And I will have them all.
~ Page 223

Sunday, March 17, 2002

The Sky Road by Ken MacLeod

Not a particularly great book but I thought this quote was sufficiently pithy to be worth remembering:

She'd sucked him rigid, fucked him raw, taught him much and told him little."
~Page 245

Angel Fire East by Terry Brooks

He shook his head. "You are too quick to dismiss your abilities and to disparage your strengths. Think for a moment. You have survived much. You have accomplished much. You are made more powerful by having done so. You should remember that."

A smile quirked at the corners of her mouth "Isn't it enough that I speak your name? O'olish Amaneh. I say it every time I feel weak or frightened or too much alone. I use it like a talisman."

The copper face warmed, and the big man nodded approvingly. "I can feel it when you do so. In here." He tapped his chest. "When you speak my name, you give me strength as well. you remember me, so that I will not be forgotten.

~ Page 196

Wednesday, March 13, 2002

New York Nights by Eric Brown:

What would his sister have said? The meaning of intimacy is different for men and women: for men it is physical, and for women emotional. perhaps she was right
~ Page 273

A Knight Of The Word by Terry Brooks

A political scientist named Banfield posited back in the early seventies that the poor are split into two groups. One is disadvantaged simply because it lacks money. Give them a jump-start and their middle-class values and work ethic will pull them trough. But the second group will fail no matter how much money you give them because they possess a radically present oriented outlook on life that attaches no value to work., sacrifice, self-improvement, or service. If that's so, if Banfield was right, then the war effort is doomed. The problem of homelessness will never be solved.

~ Page 178, refers to the work of the late Edward C. Banfield, George D. Markham Professor of Government Emeritus at Harvard University